Happy Holidays from AzMUN!

December 25, 2011 in The World Today

AzMUN Secretary-General James Vancel and Editor-in-Chief Francisco Lara in Chicago

Hello World!

The AzMUN will be taking a break for the holidays. We’ll be back on January 2nd with a post from our Africa Correspondent Chelsea Sweeney. In the meantime, enjoy a holiday poem from the Master Yeats.

A Stateman’s Holiday (Avalon)

I lived among great houses,
Riches drove out rank,
Base drove out the better blood,
And mind and body shrank.
No Oscar ruled the table,
But I’d a troop of friends
That knowing better talk had gone
Talked of odds and ends.
Some knew what ailed the world
But never said a thing,
So I have picked a better trade
And night and morning sing:
Tall dames go walking in grass-green Avalon.

Am I a great Lord Chancellor
That slept upon the Sack?
Commanding officer that tore
The khaki from his back?
Or am I de Valera,
Or the King of Greece,
Or the man that made the motors?
Ach, call me what you please!
Here’s a Montenegrin lute,
And its old sole string
Makes me sweet music
And I delight to sing:
Tall dames go walking in grass-green Avalon.

With boys and girls about him.
With any sort of clothes,
With a hat out of fashion,
With Old patched shoes,
With a ragged bandit cloak,
With an eye like a hawk,
With a stiff straight back,
With a strutting turkey walk.
With a bag full of pennies,
With a monkey on a chain,
With a great cock’s feather,
With an old foul tune.
Tall dames go walking in grass-green Avalon.

Happy Holidays and  a Happy New Year!

Best Wishes,
AzMUN Editorial Board

Thanks for installing the Bottom of every post plugin by Corey Salzano. Contact me if you need custom WordPress plugins or website design.

Let’s Talk About Guns, Not Butter.

December 24, 2011 in México, The World Today, United States

Courtesy of Mike Keefe and the Denver Post

By: Francisco Lara

After news of ATF’s botched operation, code-named Fast and Furious became public knowledge I met every update with a tempered irritation, but also some optimism. I thought, “Finally, there’ll be some real talk about the problems with arms-trafficking into Mexico. It’s a bi-national problem affecting people on both sides of the border in need of a bilateral solution.” Nowadays, I exclusively feel irritation, if not outright anger.

Operation Fast and Furious was an operation running out of the Bureau for Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives allowed weapons to be smuggled, or “walked” into Mexico with the intention of then tracing them to the higher ranks of Mexico’s drug cartels. Like I said, the operation was botched. The ATF knowingly let roughly 2,000 guns cross into Mexico, but lost track of many of them when they crossed the border. Only 600 have been recovered. To make things worse the ATF never notified anyone in the Mexican government. So imagine everyone’s surprise, when it was revealed that two of these weapons had been implicated in the fatal shooting of a Border Patrol agent near Nogales and ICE Special Agent Jaime Zapata in the Mexican state of San Luis Potosí.  Another gun of that same batch was used to murder and torture the brother of a prominent Mexican prosecutor of Chihuahua. By the ATF’s own count, 179 of their guns have been found at crime scenes. An unconfirmed number cited by the LA Times puts the number of people killed or injured by Fast and Furious weapons at 150.

It goes without saying that Mexico has already found itself the victim of the USA’s lax gun laws. In a country where over 40,000 people have died in protracted drug war, the deliberate smuggling of hundreds of weapons into Mexico is even more reprehensible. The people responsible for organizing such a misguided action should be held accountable. Indeed, they already have. Officers in the local Phoenix division of the ATF and the US attorney general assigned to Arizona have left their posts, and in the ensuing fallout ATF’s interim director was forced to resign. Now is the time for a policy discussion of how to stem the flow of weapons into Mexico. Instead, the US house of Representatives has seen it fit to turn the scandal into a witch hunt aimed at discrediting U.S Attorney-General Eric Holder and embarrassing the Obama administration.

The hearings called by Representative Issa have had almost no testimony about the substantive issue of arms smuggling. All of their energy has been spent trying to crucify Holder. Holder himself has already admitted that the operation was deeply flawed, and instructed the Inspector-General to conduct an internal investigation, but Republicans are out for blood. At the most recent hearing, Representative Ted Poe of Texas wildly suggested that officials in the Justice Department should be prosecuted for manslaughter because of their negligence. Democrats aren’t much better about shamelessly plugging themselves, but at least they’re trying to talk policy. Mike Quingley, Democrat of Illinois, probably characterizes the hearings best. “For those of you keeping score at home, one side is using this horrible screw-up to justify a policy, The other side is using this horrible screw-up to justify keeping A.T.F. weak and “extraordinarily lax” gun-control laws.

So far no documents have been able to prove that Holder knew what was going on in Phoenix, and even if he had known about the operation, his knowledge was cursory at best.  But the hearings continue almost six months after the fact. The House of Representatives should stop wasting its time scoring political points off the deaths of US agents and Mexican nationals and get back to their real job: legislating. Every second they waste is another gun smuggled into Mexico, another crime committed, another preventable death. Let’s talk about how real and serious the issue of arms smuggling actually is:

  • According to the Mexico Institute, a program of the Woodrow Wilson Center of International Scholars, over 85,000 firearms and 5 million rounds of ammunition were seized in Mexico from December 2006 to August 2010. In 2009, the Mexican government confiscated 32,332 firearms, an increase of more than 22,770 firearms over 2007 seizures.
  • Sources differ on how many of these firearms and munitions found in Mexico come from the United States. A report published in 2009 by the General Accounting Office put the quantity at 87%. Most recently the report by Senator Feinstein, notes that in 2009 and 2010, 29,284 firearms recovered in Mexico were traced by the ATF. Of those 20,504 (70%) were determined to have originated from the U.S.
  • Of the 20,451 guns recovered in 2009 44% were rifles, followed by pistols with 32%. Most recently, the report submitted by Senators Feinstein, Schumer and Whitehouse, have noted that 70% of those guns trafficked are coming from the border states of Texas (39%), California (20%) and Arizona (10%).  The rifle number is particularly alarming because until recently multiple purchases of semi-automatic rifles were exempted from the federal reporting requirement even if they had been purchased in a period of 5 days.
  • 99 of the guns recovered and traced by the ATF in 2009 were implicated in homicides. Another 82 were used in kidnappings and 311 more were related to dangerous drugs.

This is a real problem. Not Eric Holder’s knowledge or lack of knowledge. It’s time to start talking about bringing back the assault weapon ban, deepening gun regulations on gun owners and sellers, and even about expanding the ATF’s budget to bolster its enforcement efforts, so they don’t have to resort to desperate programs like these.  Heck, I would settle for Republicans bringing the Second Amendment out of their back-pocket if it would mean talking about guns, instead of the butter greasing the gears of their self-indulgent political conflict. But don’t hold your breath for a change in the conversation anytime soon. My guess is the witch hunt will proceed, and the end is nowhere in sight.  

Thanks to Andrea Lara for her advice and help in the drafting of this article.

Thanks for installing the Bottom of every post plugin by Corey Salzano. Contact me if you need custom WordPress plugins or website design.

Protests in Mexico Increase After Death of Students

December 22, 2011 in México, The World Today

Students in Puebla outraged by the killings. Courtesy of La Jornada.

By Michelle Moraila

Nearly two weeks after policemen gunned down two students of the Normal School of Ayotzinapa in Guerrero during a protest the Mexican government has finally decided to investigate the event and answer why the victims were attacked. The group of students gathered by blocking the famous “Autopista del Sol,” the liaison between Acapulco and Mexico City, to seek a raise in funds, enrollment, and a different head of schools. At least 200 local and federal officials arrived at the scene to break up the protest, detaining twenty and shooting nine people.

Though at first the Federal Police denied being involved in the shooting, eyewitness accounts that claimed otherwise created more protests and sparked harsh criticism towards Guerrero governor Angel Aguirre Rivero. Human rights activists were also outraged at this clear violation of freedom of expression and immediately contacted the United Nations. This prompted the government to finally take action and attempt to restore stability in the state.

The delay has only angered citizens and added more reasons to be skeptical about the government’s true intentions. Students all over the country holding up banners that read messages such as “Why are we being silenced?” marched to demonstrate their anger, while more than 1,500 people gathered in front of Congress asking for justice. It is unclear as to why the Federal Police got involved and used weapons to fight what was their way to express their desire for change in the school system. The detainees have now been released, but the fact that they were arrested indicates a violation of rights and a need for the government to intervene in what the Federal Police is doing. While it is true that they are taking a step towards getting to the bottom of this, it is evident that the government lacked initiative when it came to restoring the protestors’ rights. The only way they will be able to fully restore stability is if they actually listen to the students and accept the fact that they treated them as criminals when they were only exercising their right to speak up.


Thanks for installing the Bottom of every post plugin by Corey Salzano. Contact me if you need custom WordPress plugins or website design.

Feminism in Egypt

December 21, 2011 in Middle East, The World Today

By Connor Shirley
The military in Egypt was recently criticized for their abuses of women during the quelling of protests, which have included dragging them by their hair and
 stripping one half-naked in the middle of the street. Thousands of women have begun marching in protest in one of the biggest feminine protests the area has ever seen. Though women have been involved in the protests since the beginning, they have not been proportionally represented in any of the parliamentary elections, and have been systematically left out of vital decision-making processes.

The Middle East as a region is well known to be a largely, if not exclusively, patriarchal with a strong focus on the traditional role of men as the bread-earners and women as home-keepers. However, in recent times there have been changes in the familial structures of the area, prompting discourse and debate on what women should be allowed to do. More and more women are entering the workforce and beginning to ask for more political and personal rights. The case varies from state to state. In Saudi Arabia, for example, women are required by law to have a male guardian and cannot vote or run in elections. Women in Egypt account for about 12% of the industrial workforce, and are constantly becoming more heavily involved in a wide variety of jobs and positions in the government.

The traditional argument is that any progress towards equal rights for all is good progress. While this may hold true for many and most situations, I would disagree that this is the right time for a feminist movement to erupt. The region is already extraordinarily unstable, and the new government is just getting on its feet. Add in the fact that the current patriarchal ideology has been in place basically since the 800’s, and I don’t think it’s unreasonable to say that this movement is ill-timed and will only hinder process to Egypt becoming fully functional once again.

 

Thanks for installing the Bottom of every post plugin by Corey Salzano. Contact me if you need custom WordPress plugins or website design.

A Small Island in the South Atlantic

December 20, 2011 in Latin America, The World Today

British troops marching in the Falklands.

 By: Andrew Melton

It has been nearly thirty years since the war in the Malvinas, more commonly known by its English name, the Falklands. Though the bullets and missiles have stopped flying, the tension between Argentina and the United Kingdom remains high. Two major events occurred just in the past week. The first émigré from the Falkland Islands since the 1982 war obtained Argentine citizenship last week. On the 16th, Uruguay closed all ports to Falkland flagged ships causing an outcry from the British. These recent events point toward a growingly hostile turn in one of South America’s fiercest territorial disputes.

The Falkland Islands are somewhat of an anomaly. During Britain’s heyday as the world’s top naval power, English explorers came across an archipelago in the South Atlantic between the Americas and Antarctica. Though those days are long gone, the Falkland Islands remain as a relic of Britain’s colonial past. In 1982 Argentina felt compelled to relinquish Britain of the scarcely populated islands just off the South American coast. The result was one of the most pointless wars of the 20th century. Hundreds of British and Argentine soldiers died in a war that resulted with the islands remaining in British control. It was a huge defeat for Argentine nationalism and a giant boost for Margaret Thatcher’s spiraling government.

Relations have obviously cooled since the violent summer of 1982, but that does not mean Argentina is any less bitter. It is illegal to fly commercially from Argentina to the islands, with the only flight being a weekly fighter jet fly over to remind the inhabitants who lives across the water. The islander émigré was largely a symbolic blow, however Uruguay’s decision to close its ports is much more tangible. Uruguay usually practices a much more agreeable foreign policy based in peace, however this change may point towards a more unified Atlantic coast.  

It is difficult to pick a side in the conflict. Argentina has some claim to the territory considering its proximity. However, generations of Falkland islanders have grown up as citizens of the United Kingdom, and that British identity is firmly engrained in the islands’ population. Many of us outside the conflict wonder why these two nations continue to fight over islands in which sheep outnumber people. Recent reports say the Falklands sit atop a large reservoir of oil, meaning the dispute is more economically driven than nationalistic. I doubt the world will see another rendition of the 1982 war, however the increase in diplomatic hostilities is certainly cause for alarm.

Thanks for installing the Bottom of every post plugin by Corey Salzano. Contact me if you need custom WordPress plugins or website design.

Presidents and Prosecutors from The Gambia

December 19, 2011 in Africa, The World Today

By Chelsea Sweeney

The Gambia is a country primarily known for its beautiful beaches and resorts, which provide a strong tourism industry for this small country along the western coast of Africa.  But this nation is also home to two important political figures.  One traps his country under his autocratic regime, while the other hopes to bring positive change to the International Criminal Court as its newest chief prosecutor.

The first of these is the President of the Gambia, His Excellency Sheikh Professor Alhaji Doctor Yahya AJJ Jammeh.  With a name that seems too big for the smallest country in Africa, he has been in power since leading a coup against the previous autocratic leader in 1994.  In November, he was reelected for his fourth five-year term, in widely criticized elections.  While Jammeh has brought some positive changes to the country, such economic development and literacy programs, these improvements don’t outweigh the harsh policies and misinformation that have been promoted under his regime.  

Jammeh has taken the usual path of autocratic rulers by suppressing any dissent and criticism from the press.  When a newspaper owner was mysteriously gunned down in 2004, Jammeh simply questioned what was so special about the murder that required an investigation. Jammeh easily dismisses the lives of his opponents, such as the eight men who were sentenced to death last year for plotting a coup.  He also calls for the death of those he has a personal issue with, telling human rights groups that they can “go to hell” and saying that homosexuals should be beheaded.  The most astonishing of Jammeh’s declarations is that he has cured AIDS with “a green herbal paste, a bitter yellow liquid and eating bananas.”  He continues to violate one human right after another, all the while spreading more misinformation that sets back the fight against AIDS.  It is hard to believe that he thinks God has appointed him to lead for a “billion-year rule.”

Hopefully another figure from the Gambia, Fatou Bensouda, will be a positive force for the world as the ICC’s new chief prosecutor.  Bensouda was appointed to replace Luis Moreno-Ocampo when his nine-year term ends next June.  The African Union put the full weight of their support behind Bensouda, making her the obvious favorite from the beginning of the selection process.  As I wrote in a previous article, many African states are angry with the ICC for only prosecuting African nationals in its short history.  Bensouda is not apologetic for the ICC’s actions, and does not plan on backing down from prosecuting these criminals.  But at least with an African heading the prosecution, there will be fewer claims of bias, and previously uncooperative African nations may work harder to bring wanted criminals to justice.

These two Gambians are paving very different paths in addressing human rights issues.  Jammeh will do nothing but promote his downright awful worldview, while Bensouda will bring men of a similar selfish and violent nature to justice.  Jammeh has not yet stepped into the sights of the ICC, but hopefully he will be removed from power much sooner that the “billion-year rule” he envisaged.

Thanks for installing the Bottom of every post plugin by Corey Salzano. Contact me if you need custom WordPress plugins or website design.

Taiwan’s Awkward Elections

December 18, 2011 in Asia, The World Today

By: Hugo Polanco

Photo: Lin Wen-hsiung, Taipei Times

Taiwan will have elections for President and for their legislature January 14th. These elections will be the fifth such since the Island ended martial law in 1987. Taiwanese elections have rarely gone smoothly in the past. Either internal growing pains or external influences have marred previous elections. For example the first election for President, in 1996, was interrupted by mainland China firing missiles outside of Taiwan’s main ports. The 2000 election was mired with a scandal within the Nationalists party (KMT) that led their vote to be split among two contenders, subsequently the pro-independence Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was elected into power for the first time. Finally the 2004 election featured an assassination attempt on the incumbent Chen Shui-bian, who was later indicted on corruption charges.  This pattern of turbulent elections indicates just how young and fragile Taiwanese democracy really is. This coming election, while hopefully avoiding many of the more dramatic aspects of previous elections, has the potential to destabilize both Taiwan and East Asia as a whole.

At stake is the nature of Taiwan’s relationship with China. Ma Ying-jeou’s electoral victory in 2008 brought rapprochement with China after 59 years of tense relations. In quick succession his administration managed to open and reconnect Taiwan with China via direct air and shipping links, Mainland tourist access, and many other cultural exchanges.  Also his administration managed to successfully negotiate and implement the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement(ECFA), which is a trade agreement designed to lower tariffs and other trade barriers between the two sides. While both the presence of Mainland tourists and ECFA has been beneficial to Taiwan’s economy, many Taiwanese worry that the price is too high. Tsai Ing-wen, the DPP nominee, is running against President Ma Ying-jeou on a platform that rapprochement with China is occurring too rapidly and is threatening Taiwan’s sovereignty. Since Taiwan is a disputed territory with de facto independence, despite being claimed as a province of China, binding Taiwan’s economy too closely China’s could leave it vulnerable to China’s attempts to reincorporate the territory. This concern was so great that the passage of the act was mired with violence in the legislature.

As of now the election is wide open, with both candidates holding equal shares of voter approval and James Soong a third party candidate running a distant third place. A DPP victory could return Cross Strait relations to the tenuous pre Ma Ying-jeou era. A return to that era may prove to be untenable for Taiwan. Like the rest of the East Asian countries, Taiwan’s future economic growth lies in business relations with China. The current political relationship between both sides is a flimsy façade, a façade that however must be maintained. This façade allows China to preserve its myth of national unity while allowing the Taiwanese to exercise de facto independence. It must be a bitter and humiliating pill for the Taiwanese to swallow, to be denied all the formal trappings of prosperous and independent state. Taiwan has long paid this price and despite the desire to reevaluate the speed and depth of Cross Strait relations, the DPP would probably not move toward altering the status quo. The Chinese must be prepared for the possibility of a DPP victory and act responsibly. An overly negative or heavy handed response will only confirm the fears of many Taiwanese that China seeks to aggressively reincorporate them. Such a situation would hamper China’s goals of deeper connections with Taiwan and simultaneously severely limit Taiwan’s future growth.  While on China’s insistence the relationship cannot be at a state to state level, a more stable relationship must be established that does not rely on the preference of the Chinese for certain political parties.

http://uk.reuters.com/article/2011/12/17/uk-taiwan-election-debate-idUKTRE7BG0CH20111217

http://the-diplomat.com/2011/12/18/cross-strait-ties-at-crossroads/

Thanks for installing the Bottom of every post plugin by Corey Salzano. Contact me if you need custom WordPress plugins or website design.

Newt Gingrich vs. the Skeletons in his Closet

December 17, 2011 in The World Today, United States

By: Beatrice Nielsen

Newt Gingrich: why is this happening? The Republican Party, as I have discussed previously, has some serious issues with candidates for the 2012 presidential election. But those issues causing Newt Gingrich’s recent meteoric rise? This is a perplexing development in the Republican candidacy process.

Unlike the GOP’s obsessions with Michele Bachmann and Herman Cain, the Newt phase is seemingly founded on more stable political ground. His credentials in politics are impressive. The success of the Republican Party in the 1990’s is largely due to Mr. Gingrich’s “Contract with America”, which offered a very specific conservative agenda that included plans for a smaller government, lower taxes, and greater entrepreneurial activity. The Republican Party swept Congress in 1994; Gingrich became Speaker of the House in 1995.

In contrast, Newt Gingrich’s personal life and absence of a conscience are worrisome. In addition to being worrisome in terms of ‘morality’, it is confusing that the resurgence of the moral majority ideal in the GOP is throwing support behind Mr. Gingrich. Eighty-four ethics charges were brought against Mr. Gingrich when he was Speaker of the House, and the House Ethics Committee investigated him and imposed ethics sanctions upon him, marking the first time a Speaker had been deemed ethically irresponsible.

Morality aside, it is perplexing that Newt Gingrich has not rescinded his bid for candidacy before now. This summer, his campaign staff resigned en masse to join Tim Pawlenty’s campaign (which has since been dismantled), leaving most Americans and political pundits to write Gingrich off as being a dark horse for more reasons that those listed previously. But the meltdown of Gingrich’s first-string campaigners did not destroy his drive for the nomination; in fact, his campaign has strengthened.

In keeping with this election season’s volatility, I think that the Newt phase is a desperate attempt by the Republicans to find someone dynamic who is not Mitt Romney. Nearly all of the candidates have had their moments in the sun since announcing their candidacy (except Jon Huntsman, the most qualified of the bunch).

If a party requires that their candidate take a vow of fidelity to retain support, he is probably not the right man for the nomination, much less the presidency.

Thanks for installing the Bottom of every post plugin by Corey Salzano. Contact me if you need custom WordPress plugins or website design.

A Downside of Democracy: France and Russia Err.

December 16, 2011 in Europe, The World Today

By: Zach Wojtowicz

Russian Protests

Courtesy Oleg Kozlovsky's English Weblog

Two European nations, the French Republic and Russian Federation, tarnished the name of democracy this week. 

In the French case, courts convicted the former president of their nation, Jacques Chirac, of abusing his 18-year governorship of Paris to gain political support, a judgement which moreover represented the conviction of conventional French political machines as habitually illegal. Despite the courage of carrying through charges against a former president (which could only begin after his presidential immunity was deactivated in 2007), courts ended up slapping Chirac on the wrist. After taking “his age, health, and status as a former head of state into account when determining his sentence”, a suspended prison sentence was awarded. This means that, unless Chirac embezzles some more funds or creates new fake jobs in the near future, he will never go to jail at all. 

In the Russian case, middle class protesters called shenanigans on December the 4th’s Duma election, where efforts by the United Russia party to shore up ballot numbers are increasingly obvious. The ruling party’s numbers fell from a proud 70% to a strong 52% of the plurality, from a constitutional majority to just a plain old absolute majority. Skeptics claim that the true results of the election could have left United Russia with only 30-35% of the vote, which would have forced them to work with other parties on legislation. The situation is slightly ironic. The slighted second place party, which won just under 20% of the seats, was the Russian Communist Party. Russian democracy, which was born out of a rejection of Soviet communism, has now adopted undemocratic practices so that it can suppress the same communist ideology it once sought freedom from.

These events have come at a time when the European continent is flirting with creating super-democratic bodies which would control decisions for many EU countries at the expense of state sovereignty. If local and national governments of western and eastern European countries – France and Russia – cannot prevent the corruption of democracy, will a super-national democratic system be subject to even more perilous weakness?

International democracy might have a special, natural defense against corruption. The stakes of policies which affect the whole of Europe are so high that media would scrutinize any mechanism which decides them to the utmost. On the other hand, the stakes of decisions which affect the whole of Europe are so high that interested actors would do anything, risk anything, to distort outcomes in their favor.

In the words of one European statesman, Sir Winston Churchill: “It has been said that democracy is the worst form of government, except all the others that have been tried”. Maybe good ol’ Winston is right. Sure, democracy is largely a circus of corruption and special interests, but it is effective overall. Russia has grown economically and enjoys higher standards of living. France continues its pride and affection for Jacques Chirac.

Sources:
Jacques Chirac: Liberty, equality, but not impunity
France’s Jacques Chirac convicted of corruption
Russia: The long life of Homo sovieticus
Voting, Russian-style

Thanks for installing the Bottom of every post plugin by Corey Salzano. Contact me if you need custom WordPress plugins or website design.

México Leads the G-20 in 2012, Sets Priorities for New Year

December 15, 2011 in México, The World Today

 

President Felipe Calderon and President Nicolas Sarkozy during the second day of the G20 Summit in Cannes, France. Courtesy of The Washington Post.

By Michelle Moraila

As the rest of the world tries to figure out what to do about the economic crisis, México puts its two cents in (but not literally) and suggests that developed economies provide the International Monetary Fund with more funds. The official statement, addressed by President Felipe Calderón Hinojosa, was part of the seminar held this past week that officially initiated México’s role as chair of the G-20 for this upcoming year.

“The G-20 (must) contribute to designing mechanisms to increase the IMF’s resources in the short term so that it can attend to the most pressing needs of the current crisis,” said Calderón. He hopes to promote stability and achieve fundamental reforms that allow for economic growth with the help of other emerging economies.

The G-20 is a group of 20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors (they represent 19 countries, plus the European Union) that regularly assemble to talk about economic issues. Every year, the chair rotates between members and the leaders propose ideas to tackle crisis such as the one that the world is currently in. 2012 is the year for México, and it might just be what Calderón needs to prove himself. When French President Nicolas Sarkozy announced in early November that México would lead the group into the next year, Calderón instantly expressed his thanks and even tweeted that México is the first Latin American country to such title.

It was an honor that was bound to happen eventually considering México boasts Latin America’s second largest economy and is part of a promising group of emerging economies that is being called “TIMBI.” This is an acronym for Turkey, India, México, Brazil, and Indonesia, all countries whose economies are booming and replaced the famous BRIC countries from a decade ago.

Even though there is still a lot of controversy surrounding Calderón’s leadership in México and the G-20 from opponents who claim he is a criminal, I beg to differ. I think this is a fantastic way for him to demonstrate that the Mexican economy did not suffer as much as some other major economies did. However, it seems like will be a challenging year for Calderón, seeing as the Mexican economy is very much tied to the United States’ and it may be difficult to address economies that are not so close to home. Hopefully, the G-20 will find a clear solution to the massive economic problem that we are all in by the time of their next meeting in Los Cabos, México.

Thanks for installing the Bottom of every post plugin by Corey Salzano. Contact me if you need custom WordPress plugins or website design.