Saftey in Solitude: the Swiss Franc

June 18, 2012 in The World Today

by Morgan Maxwell

If you’re in Europe and hoping to grow your list of countries visited with record speed you may want to check out the Bodensee area. Also known as Lake Constance, the Bodensee is a 207 square mile lake that has shores on Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Public transportation and free trade make it easy to tote schnitzel and pretzels between Germany and Austria without problem.

When it comes to Switzerland, however, things become more complicated. Sure, you don’t have to sacrifice your bratwurst and Pilsner at the border; rather, you’ll have to do quite a bit of guess work at where the country boundary actually falls. With no imposing wall or armored guard strolling into Switzerland may seem no different than other travel within the European Union. There is, however, one important distinction. If you hope to bring back a bag full of miniature Swiss flags and chocolate bars you’ll have to ditch the Euro in favor of the Franc.

The Franc, worth about .8 Euros, is one of the most obvious signs of Switzerland’s distance from the EU. The decision not to join was made in 1992 after voters chose not to participate the EEA (European Economic Area.) While Swiss refusal to join with 27 other countries in Europe’s largest political and economic partnership may have seemed like an act of stubbornness and nationalism in the past, the current economic climate demands we allow reconsideration. With pop culture references to the elusive Swiss bank account it’s easy to imagine the nation as a safe haven for tax evasion but now it seems like it may be offering a different form of financial security.

Greece’s financial struggles have left the fate of the Euro uncertain and many wondering if the switch to a single currency was a wise decision. These doubts are only supported by the mass withdrawal of funds from Greek banks with up to 1.2 billion euros having been removed after the election. More importantly, the European Union and IMF have funneled over 230 billion euros into supporting Greece.

These problems, for the most part, are not something Switzerland has to contend with. Of course all nations have vested interest in the Euro because of its effect on the global economy, but separation from the EU offers Switzerland some measure of safety. So the question is whether the economic safety found in the Swiss Franc is worth sacrificing the benefits of EU membership. If Switzerland, rather than Greece, was in need of economic help it is unlikely it would have received similar support from the European Union. Free trade within the EU has resulted in a much greater diversity of products available along with the creation of an additional 2.75 million jobs, and these are just a few advantages of membership.

So, I guess the conclusion is, in times economic stability a single currency and political partnership provides incredibly worthwhile opportunities. When that stability is threatened, however, the economic future of each member nation hangs in the balance. In the coming years travel around the Bodensee and the value of currency in the area may look very different than it does today.

This post reflects the author’s personal opinions, not the opinions of Arizona Model United Nations.

Civil Liberties in Kuwait

March 28, 2012 in Middle East, The World Today

by Morgan Maxwell

The aftermath of the attack on Scope TV's main studio by Awazem tribe members

While arguments regarding the right to birth control dominate media attention in America, the nation of Kuwait is experiencing a similar consideration of civil liberties. A series of suggested amendments to Kuwaiti audiovisual laws are proving to be the source of a great deal of contention. Among the proposed changes are: a one to two year penalty for any person insulting god, an increase of fines for publishing news without a license, and a KD1 million fine for damaging national unity.

The restrictions were suggested after an incident in which the chief of the Awazem tribe was allegedly criticized during a Scope TV live broadcast. Over 150 tribe members responded with an attack on the network building and damaging the network’s property. Reports also suggest that attackers attempted to burn the building down with no success. Al-Qallaf, the man responsible for the alleged statements against the chief, soon issued a formal apology for the misinterpretation of his statement and for compromising national unity. Both parties are facing prosecution and Al-Qallaf’s remarks have resulted in some measure of public outcry defending Al-Qallaf’s patriotism and dedication to Kuwait.

Despite the Scope TV incident many argue the proposed media restrictions threaten to drastically affect the range of Kuwaiti press and broadcasting. One of the most vocal opposing organizations is the Kuwait Journalists Association which has called for a boycott of responsible law makers. They feel as though the audiovisual amendments infringe on personal and press liberties afforded by the Kuwaiti constitution. Whether or not this is the case, is unclear. Article 37 of the Kuwaiti Constitution establishes freedom of the press but only within the limits specified by other law. The phrasing of article 37 allows for a great deal of interpretation and offers no concrete grounds for objections to the proposed restrictions.  Additionally, both the Constitution’s preamble and Article 2 clearly outline the role of the Islamic religion in the legislative process. This would suggest that the proposed restrictions are supported rather than refuted by the Kuwaiti constitution. The issue then becomes more a matter of moral justification than legal justification.

The spirit of national pride and unity is an arguably integral part of a functioning society. Still, its importance isn’t necessarily great enough to defend infringement on civil liberties. The ability of the press to provide a fair and accurate account of current issues is just as central to the effective operation of society. Limiting broadcasts because they may upset individuals or differ from public opinion is contrary to the function of media. The laws regarding the range of media topics in Kuwait already seem to interfere with the presentation of news and increasing their scope, regardless of the justification, is not in the best interests of the nation.

This post reflects the author’s personal opinions, not the opinions of Arizona Model United Nations.

This post reflects the author’s personal opinions, not the opinions of Arizona Model United Nations.